This code is issued by the Victorian Public Sector Commission in accordance with sections 7 and 61 of the Public Administration Act 2004.
The Victorian Public Sector Commission has issued the Code of Conduct for Directors of Victorian Public Entities 2024 (the Code). The Code replaces and updates the 2016 Code of Conduct for Directors of Victorian Public Entities.
Watch this short video to understand the key changes to the Code.
The 2016 Code of Conduct for Directors of Victorian Public Entities was in effect from 29 March 2016 to 29 February 2024. The 2016 Code of Conduct consolidated the 2006 Directors Code and Guidance Notes to provide a more practical approach and consistent understanding of key obligations and responsibilities relevant across the diverse public sector. It clearly described the collective responsibilities of the board and the individual responsibilities of board members, including duties of the chairperson. The 2016 Code also applied to statutory office holders (other than those of special bodies). A key change was the incorporation of governance principles of public entities prescribed in Part 5 of the Public Administration Act 2004, such as s 79 duties of directors, s 80 duties of chairperson, s 81 duties of entity and s 85 accountability. Another introduction outlined the requirements of Directors standing for election. 2016 Code of Conduct for Directors of Victorian public entities
This code takes effect on 1 March 2024.
Brigid Monagle
Victorian Public Sector Commissioner
08/02/2024
As the Victorian Public Sector Commissioner, l have a duty to issue codes of conduct under section 61 of the Public Administration Act 2004 that are based on, and promote adherence to, the public sector values.
The Directors’ Code was last issued in 2016.
Part of my role includes amending and reissuing the Directors’ Code to ensure that the binding obligations it places on directors (board members) of public entities are clear, relevant and protect the public interest.
It is vital that directors act – and be seen to act – in good faith in the best interests of the public entity that they govern on behalf of all Victorians.
This includes acting with integrity, honesty, fairness, due skill, care and diligence, and in an impartial and apolitical manner.
I recommend that directors, and other public officials to whom the Directors’ Code 2024 applies, familiarise themselves with the code’s requirements and discuss them with the other members of their board. Directors must comply with these requirements individually and collectively.
By following the Directors’ Code 2024, directors will help to ensure that Victoria’s public entities fulfill their functions in the best interests of the Victorian community they serve.
Brigid Monagle
Victorian Public Sector Commissioner
08/02/2024
Section 7 of the Public Administration Act 2004 (the Act) sets out the public sector values, which the requirements in this code promote adherence to.
Public officials should demonstrate responsiveness by:
Public officials should demonstrate integrity by:
Public officials should demonstrate impartiality by:
Public officials should demonstrate accountability by:
Public officials should demonstrate respect for colleagues, other public officials and members of the Victorian community by:
Public officials should demonstrate leadership by actively implementing, promoting and supporting these values.
Public officials should respect and promote the human rights set out in the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities by:
The requirements in this code promote adherence to the public sector values in section 7 of the Public Administration Act 2004 (the Act).
The code sets standards of behaviour for:
These standards of behaviour apply to the director or other statutory office holder from the date of their appointment.
In this Code, the term ‘director’ refers to directors and, to the extent applicable, other statutory office holders as described above.
Other conduct requirements may also apply to directors – for example other requirements in:
Directors who are unsure of the appropriate action to take in a situation should seek advice from their chairperson.
The chairperson may seek advice from the Secretary of the portfolio department and/or the Minister, as appropriate in the circumstances.
Certain professions have professional codes of conduct that establish specific behaviours relevant to that profession.
The Directors’ Code 2024 should be read by directors in conjunction with any professional conduct code that applies to them.
A breach of a professional code may affect:
However, a breach of the Directors’ Code 2024, and any sanctions arising, can only be determined in accordance with procedures established for this code.
Directors must familiarise themselves with this code.
A failure to comply with the requirements of this code may amount to misconduct. In the most serious cases, this may lead to suspension or removal from office.
In addition, a director who improperly uses their position to gain advantage for themselves or someone else, or to cause detriment to the public entity, will be liable for their actions under both civil and criminal law.
Directors are members of the board of the public entity. The board is the governing body. As such, directors have both individual and collective responsibilities.
This part of the code outlines the behaviours required of the collective board.
The board safeguards and oversees the management of the public entity.
It must ensure that the entity:
The board must ensure appropriate arrangements are in place to meet the entity’s legal and policy obligations.
For example, it must ensure information is provided to the department and the Minister in accordance with the Act and this code.
Examples of the board’s leadership and stewardship role include:
The board must ensure that the necessary delegations are in place.
It should also ensure that matters reserved for the board are clearly identified.
The board must only make decisions within its power.
This is a fundamental restriction which the board must comply with.
At times, the board may wish to do something that is not authorised under the public entity’s establishing documentation (for example, establishing Act or Terms of Reference).
Even if what is proposed would be in the public interest and consistent with the entity’s objectives, the board must not act beyond its power.
One possible solution could be to contact the department or the Minister. The Minister may be able to issue directions to facilitate the action or may consider potential legislative change.
The board is accountable for the actions of its delegates and sub-committees.
Directors of a sub-committee who are delegated to consider a matter cannot lawfully delegate that power or function to any other individual or body unless the law expressly authorises such delegation.
The board must act in the best interests of the public entity.
In doing so, it must act in accordance with the entity’s objectives, functions and powers.
It should also act consistently with any business or strategic plan or other document relevant to its work program.
The board plays an important role in overseeing the management of risks faced by a public entity. As part of this role, the board must:
If a director has a conflict of interest, for example a conflict of duty, the board must manage the conflict in the public interest, consistent with its conflict of interest policy.
If a director has a conflict in relation to an item on the agenda this must be declared and recorded in the minutes of the meeting, even if it has been previously declared. The board’s decision on how to manage the conflict must also be recorded in the minutes.
If there is a breach of the board’s conflict of interest policy in relation to a material (serious) conflict, the board must notify the Minister in writing as soon as practicable.
The board must not make loans or give guarantees to provide security for loans or other undertaking to directors or their families or associates.
The chairperson or their properly appointed delegate must preside at meetings of the board.
The chairperson should ensure all directors have ready access to up-to-date copies of relevant legislation, policies and procedures.
The chairperson must advise the Minister and the department of:
Directors should promote the public sector values to employees through their exemplary behaviour.
In doing so, they should encourage a strong culture of accountability where:
Directors must comply with the legislation, ministerial charter, constitution, terms of reference and/or other document under which the public entity was established.
They must also comply with any government policies and priorities and with any lawful ministerial directions that affect the entity.
Directors must comply with the relevant policies and procedures of the entity.
The board must also develop and comply with policies that apply specifically to the board, including those relating to:
Directors must exercise their powers with a reasonable degree of care, diligence and skill.
Directors should be professional and respectful in their dealings with the other members of their board.
Directors may ask management for detailed briefings on the public entity’s business to inform strategic planning and risk minimisation.
Directors must act in good faith in the best interests of the public entity. This requirement applies at all times, not just at board meetings.
They must be objective in board discussions and decisions.
They must not allow their personal or professional interests or relationships to influence their judgement.
Directors must not join a board if they consider that the impartiality of their decisions may be compromised or would reasonably be perceived to be compromised.
Directors must behave in a way that reflects well on their standing as a board member and on the public’s trust in the public entity. This is the responsibility of each director.
The chairperson should:
In doing so, they can seek support from the department or the Minister, as appropriate.
Directors must only use their position to promote the best interests of the public entity.
Directors must only use the information they gain in the course of their board duties for its intended purpose.
They must not use the information, including privileged information or commercially sensitive information, to:
Directors must only disclose official information or documents:
In addition, when making public comment directors must not express their personal opinion on official policy or practice.
They must respect confidentiality and use their discretion, prudence and good judgement when deciding how to treat information in a manner that is consistent with their authority and the board’s position.
Directors should be well informed about privacy and freedom of information laws.
Former directors will generally have ongoing confidentiality obligations even when they are no longer members of the board.
Nothing in this code prevents a director who believes that corrupt or improper conduct is occurring from making a complaint directly to the Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission (IBAC) or the Victorian Ombudsman. Sometimes this can occur on a whistle blower basis as a public interest disclosure.
Directors must notify the board if they become a candidate for an election in any state, local or federal election.
They must not use the public entity’s resources in connection with their candidature.
Directors must act fairly and impartially.
When participating in board deliberations and decisions they must:
Directors must also implement policies and programs equitably.
When performing their board duties, directors must:
They should also be professional and respectful in their treatment of others, including other board members.
Directors must act in a financially responsible manner. They must exercise care in relation to public funds and assets and, if applicable, comply with:
Directors must act with honesty and integrity.
As part of this requirement, they must:
Directors should also:
Directors must comply with the board’s policy on managing conflicts of interest, including conflicts of duty.
Where possible, they should avoid any actual, potential or perceived conflicts.
If a conflict of interest arises it must be declared so that it can be managed by the board in the public interest.
At the start of each board meeting, directors must:
Directors who are appointed to boards after having been nominated by industry groups, other government agencies or stakeholders must act in the best interests of the public entity.
Additional requirements in relation to conflict of interest apply if a director is or has been engaged in lobbying activities in Victoria or elsewhere that may relate to the public entity.
If a director was previously engaged in lobbying activities that may relate to the functions of the public entity (including activities undertaken in other jurisdictions) these must be declared as soon as practicable.
This applies whether the director engaged in the lobbying activity:
Any such previous lobbying activity that relates to a matter on the board’s meeting agenda must be declared by the director at the start of the meeting, even if the interest has previously been declared.
The board will determine if any interest declared by a director is a conflict of interest and, if so, how it is to be managed in accordance with the board’s conflict of interest policy.
These requirements in item 3.13 extend to the board’s committees and sub committees.
The above requirements (item 3.13) are additional to those that apply to all directors. For example, the general integrity requirements in this code, including: